Wow! Both are great, but if I had to choose, the original one would be my choice. I think that its "crispiness" reflects the beauty of the model in a more faithful way. Nothing bad with this one though. It is just a personal opinion. Kudos to both, model and photographer!
honestly I like the other one (the one in the little box) it's sharper and brings her features out more. IMHO... she is too pretty to soften up... I guess she is soft enough already, naturally? lol yeah.. that's it
that's just not fair to ask us, lol. But really, I prefer the "original" or "linked one" instead of this one. I actually would like to see more photos without that 'fog' effect on them. I mean it's nice, but sometimes I miss just getting the clarity of the model. She's amazing!
Honestly i think the original is better, its pretty popular to over develop pics, I think a well lit & captured shot can say it all. Instragram-esque stuff is cool but your work is always super well done, If i had the talent to do portrait photography, a lot could be learned from how you shoot, theres my 2cents
hello friend personally i like the original more, you have a knack for capturing a beautiful woman in a natural as possible way and that`s surprisingly rare. however, your edit is very well done, you haven`t over done it so to speak and if i had seen that one first i probably would have preferred it, it`s that close to call between them i think. both excellent, put it that way